Study of the Effect of Fuel Bed Thickness on Surface Fire Spread using Physics-based Simulation

Kyeongnam Kwon; Ye-Eun Lee; Seong-kyun Im

doi:10.15231/jksc.2026.31.2.001

All Issue

2026 Vol.31, Issue 2 Next Page

Research Article

Study of the Effect of Fuel Bed Thickness on Surface Fire Spread using Physics-based Simulation 물리기반 시뮬레이션을 통한 산불 지표화 확산의 연료 베드 두께 영향 연구

30 June 2026. pp. 1-9

PDF XML

Abstract

This study analyzes surface fire spread under varying fuel thickness and wind speed using a physics-based simulation. A small wind tunnel experiment was conducted to validate the simulation, and the predicted flame spread rate showed less than 15% error compared with the experimental results. To overcome the limitations of the wind tunnel experiment, including wall effects and limited fuel load per unit length, additional simulations were configured to represent unretarded flame spread. Parametric simulations were performed by varying fuel bed thickness, bulk fuel density, and wind speed. The results indicate that the flame spread rate decreases with increasing bulk fuel density due to reduced oxygen availability and increased heat absorption. Furthermore, the spread rate converges beyond a certain fuel bed thickness, indicating the existence of an effective burning depth. These results highlight limitations of empirical wildfire spread models and provide insights for improving wildfire spread prediction.

Keywords

Wildfire

Surface fire

Fuel bed thickness

Thermal penetration depth

FDS

References

A.P. Williams, J.T. Abatzoglou, A. Gershunov, J. Guzman-Morales, D.A. Bishop, J.K. Balch, D.P. Lettenmaier, Observed Impacts of Anthropogenic Climate Change on Wildfire in California, Earth’s Future 7 (2019) 892-910.

10.1029/2019EF001210

D.Y. Chang, S. Jeong, C.E. Park, H. Park, J. Shin, Y. Bae, H. Park, C.R. Park, Unprecedented wildfires in Korea: Historical evidence of increasing wildfire activity due to climate change, Agric. For. Meteorol. 348 (2024) 109920.

B. Lee, J. Chung, M. Lee, Development of forest fire growth prediction algorithm for GIS applications, J. Korean For. Soc. 91(6) (2002) 812-819.

H. Singh, L. Ang, D. Paudyal, M. Acuna, P.K. Srivastava, S.K. Srivastava, A Comprehensive Review of Empirical and Dynamic Wildfire Simulators and Machine Learning Techniques used for the Prediction of Wildfire in Australia, Technol. Knowl. Learn. 30 (2025) 935-968.

10.1007/s10758-025-09839-5

R.C. Rothermel, A Mathematical Model for Predicting Fire Spread in Wildland Fuels, Res. Pap. INT-115, USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT, USA, 1972.

P.L. Andrews, BEHAVE: Fire Behavior Prediction and Fuel Modeling System, part 1, General technical Report INT-194, USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT, USA, 1986.

10.2737/INT-GTR-194

M.A. Finney, FARSITE: Fire Area Simulator-model development and evaluation, Res. Pap. RMRS-RP-4, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, UT, USA, 1998.

10.2737/RMRS-RP-4

N.P. Cheney, J.S. Gould, W.R. Catchpole, Prediction of fire spread in grasslands, Int. J. Wildland Fire 8(1) (1998) 1-13.

10.1071/WF9980001

H. Singh, L.M. Ang, T. Lewis, D. Paudyal, M. Acuna P.K. Srivastva, S.K. Srivastava, Trending and emerging prospects of physics-based and ML-based wildfire spread models: a comprehensive review, J. For. Res. 35 (2024) 135.

W. Mell, R.J. McDermott, G.P. Forney, C. Hoffman, M. Ginder, Wildland Fire Behavior Modeling: Perspectives, New Approaches and Applications, 3^rd Fire Behavior and Fuels Conference (2010), pp.1-16.

W. Mell, M.A. Jenkins, J. Gould, P. Cheney, A physics-based approach to modelling grassland fires, Int. J. Wildland Fire 16 (2007) 1-22.

10.1071/WF06002

W. Mell, A. Maranghides, R. McDermott, S.L. Manzello, Numerical simulation and experiments of burning douglas fir trees, Combust. Flame 156 (2009) 2023-2041.

10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.06.015

K. McGrattan, S. Hostikka, J. Floyd, R. McDermott, M. Vanella, E. Mueller, C. Paul, Fire Dynamics Simulator User’s Guide, NIST Special Publication 1019, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2025.

K. McGrattan, S. Hostikka, J. Floyd, R. McDermott, M. Vanella, E. Mueller, C. Paul, Fire Dynamics Simulator Technical Reference Guide, Volume 1: Mathematical Model, sixth ed., NIST Special Publication 1018-1, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2025.

A. Anca-Couce, N. Zobel, A. Berger, F. Behrendt, Smouldering of pine wood: kinetics and reaction heats, Combust. Flame 159 (2012) 1708-1719.

10.1016/j.combustflame.2011.11.015

R.M. Rowell, M.A. Dietenberger, Handbook of Wood Chemistry and Wood Composites 2^nd edition, CRC Press, Florida, USA, 2013.

R. Barzegar, A. Yozgatligil, H. Olgun, A.T. Atimtay, TGA and kinetic study of different torrefaction conditions of wood biomass under air and oxy-fuel combustion atmospheres, J. Energy Inst. 93 (2020) 889-898.

10.1016/j.joei.2019.08.001

R. Wilson, Reformulation of forest fire spread equations in SI units, Research Note INT-292, USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Range and Forest Experiment Station, Ogden, UT, USA, 1980.

10.2737/INT-RN-292

Information

Publisher :The Korean Society of Combustion
Publisher(Ko) :한국연소학회
Journal Title :Journal of the Korean Society of Combustion
Journal Title(Ko) :한국연소학회지
Volume : 31
No :2
Pages :1-9
Received Date : 2026-03-09
Revised Date : 2026-05-18
Accepted Date : 2026-05-18
DOI :https://doi.org/10.15231/jksc.2026.31.2.001

Journal of the Korean Society of Combustion ISSN:1226-0959(Print) 2466-2089(Online) 한국연소학회지

All Issue